EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF THE RESEARCH PROBLEM: METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES AND EMPIRICAL VALIDATION IN CONTEMPORARY ACADEMIC INQUIRY

Authors

  • Babayeva Lola Ibragimovna Associate Professor Department of Tourism and Marketing Karshi State University G-mail:lolababa162@gmail.com
  • Khamrayeva Marjona Fakhriddinovna Uzbek State University of World Languages Foreign Language and Literature educational field 4th year student

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66345/stj.v4i5/1.6362

Keywords:

experimental research, research design, empirical analysis, methodology, validity, data analysis, scientific inquiry

Abstract

This paper analyses how experimental approaches can be used to solve complex research issues in the modern academic enquiry. Experimental design has gained prominence in the context of growing needs of evidence-based decision-making, as a method of validating theoretical assumptions and testing cause-effect relationships. The paper will discuss the role of experimental methods in identifying, analyzing, and solving research issues, focusing on their methodological rigor and empirical reliability. The study is based on theoretical analysis and empirical investigation, relying on the frameworks on experimental research. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.https://books.google.co.uz/books?id=cIJH0lR33bgC&redir_esc=y 504 4 5/1

2. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixedmethods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://books.google.co.uz/books?id=335ZDwAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y

3. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin. https://iaes.cgiar.org/sites/default/files/pdf/147.pdf

4. Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton University Press.

https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691120355/mostly-harmless-econometrics

5. Banerjee, A. V., & Duflo, E. (2011). Poor economics: A radical rethinking of the way to fight global poverty. PublicAffairs. https://paxmongolica.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/poor-economics-aradical-rethinking-of-the-way-to-fight-global-poverty-by-abhijit-v-banerjee-and-esther-duflo-pdf.pdf

6. Deaton, A., & Cartwright, N. (2018). Understanding and misunderstanding randomized controlledtr ials. Social Science & Medicine, 210, 2–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.12.005

7. List, J. A., Sadoff, S., & Wagner, M. (2011). So you want to run an experiment, now what? Some simple rules of thumb for optimal experimental design. Experimental Economics, 14(4), 439–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-011-9275-7

Downloads

Published

2026-05-25

How to Cite

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF THE RESEARCH PROBLEM: METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES AND EMPIRICAL VALIDATION IN CONTEMPORARY ACADEMIC INQUIRY. (2026). SCIENCE TIME JOURNAL, 4(5/1), 497-504. https://doi.org/10.66345/stj.v4i5/1.6362
Indexed & Abstracted In

Our articles are indexed and discoverable across leading academic databases worldwide