OPTIMIZING TIME MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES FOR EFFECTIVE READING: A COMPREHENSIVE STUDY
Keywords:
reading comprehension, scaffolding, time management in reading, contextualizing, metacognition, teacher supportAbstract
The article closely examines the various time-saving methods that can be employed to boost reading effectiveness. The extensive research offers an in-depth understanding of the methodologies that readers should apply to maximize their study time. As a result, people can attain faster reading paces, reading retention, and comprehension thus spend less time consumed in learning. For those who wish to enhance their culture of reading and get better grades or work better, this is a perfect guide.
References
Houtveen, A. A. M., Booij, N., de Jong, R., & Van de Grift, W. J. C. M. (1999). Adaptive instruction and pupil achievement. School Effectiveness & School Improvement, 10(2), 172–193.
In A. E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (3rd edn, pp. 205–242).
Newark, DE: International Reading Association. Durkin, D. (1979). What classroom observation reveals about reading comprehension instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 14, 481–533. Elley, W. B. (1992).
How in the world do students read? Den Haag, The Netherlands: I.E.A. Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Williams, J. P., & Baker, S. (2001). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities: Review of research. Review of Educational Research, 71(2), 279–321.
Schraw, G., & Bruning, R. (1999). How implicit models of reading affect motivation to read and reading engagement. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3(3), 281–302.
Baker, L. (2005). Developmental differences in metacognition: Implications for metacognitively oriented reading instruction. In S.E. Israel, C.C. Block, K.L. Bauserman, & K. Kinnucan-Welsch (Eds.), Metacognition in literacy learning: Theory, assessment, and professional development (pp. 61–79). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
