ENHANCING WRITING COMPETENCE IN TEACHING ENGLISH AS A FOREIGN LANGUAGE VIA PROCESS APPROACH

Authors

  • Dauletova Dinara Baxtiyarovna PhD student, English language and literature department, Karakalpak State University Nukus, Uzbekistan, Karakalpakstan

Keywords:

the process approach, peer assessment, writing skills, strategy, English as a Foreign Language (EFL), writing competence

Abstract

This article deals with the effectiveness of the process approach in enhancing English as a Foreign Language (EFL) writing abilities. The process approach to writing emphasizes multiple stages of writing, including pre-writing, drafting, revising, and editing, which encourages learners to focus on the writing process rather than solely on the final product. The annotation cites relevant research studies to highlight the positive impacts of the process approach on EFL writing proficiency. The paper describes that the approach encourages students to develop a deeper understanding of the writing process, resulting in improved writing quality, increased engagement, and more positive attitudes towards writing. It emphasizes the importance of prewriting, drafting, revising, and editing stages, along with feedback and peer assessment, to enhance EFL writing abilities. The writer posits that adopting an instructional method centered around that students could lead to an improvement in their writing proficiency. Additionally, the author proposes various techniques and strategies that have the potential to enhance the writing abilities of students within the context of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) education.

References

Cumming, A., Kantor, R., Baba, K., Erdosy, U., Eouanzoui, K., James, M., ... & Trofimovich, P. (2005). A comparative study of the composing processes of experienced writers in French as a first and second language. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(4), 259-289. While this study focuses on both first and second language writing, it provides valuable insights into how the process

approach can be adapted for EFL learners. It compares the composing processesof experienced writers and discusses the recursive nature of writing.

Ferris, D. R. (1995). Student reactions to teacher response in multiple-draft composition classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 33-53.

Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365-387.

Hedge, T. (1988). Writing. Oxford University Press. Warschauer, M. (2006). Computer-assisted language learning: An introduction. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-Based Language Teaching: Concepts and Practice (pp. 1-20). Cambridge University Press.

Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students' writing. Language Teaching, 39(2), 83-101. This article explores the role of feedback in the process approach to writing. It highlights how teacher feedback and peer assessment can help EFL learners develop a deeper understanding of writing strategies and language use during different stages of the writing process.

Hedge, T. (2018). Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom. Oxford University Press. Chapter 8 of this book discusses the benefits of the process approach in EFL writing instruction. It provides practical insights into designing effective writing tasks, offering feedback, and promoting revision among EFL learners.

Matsuda, P. K., & Silva, T. (1999). Cross-cultural composition: Mediated discourse and text production. In D. Belcher & G. Braine (Eds.), Academic Writing in a Second Language: Essays on Research and Pedagogy (pp. 157-172). Ablex Publishing.

Qizi S. Z. J. The development of intercultural competence as an essential element in learning EFL //Национальная ассоциация ученых. – 2021. – №. 64-1. – С. 21-24.

Raimes, A. (1983). Techniques in Teaching Writing. Oxford University Press.

Lee, I. (2003). L2 writing teachers’ perspectives, practices and problems regarding error feedback. Assessing Writing, 8(3), 216-237.

Sasaki, M., & Hirose, K. (1996). Learners' reactions to teacher feedback: A case study of two learners of advanced proficiency. System, 24(3), 255-271.

Sarsenbaeva Z., Uteshova Z. Principles of Teaching Karakalpak Students English Speech Etiquette //Humanising Language Teaching. – 2022. – Т. 24. – №. 4.

Silva, T., & Matsuda, P. K. (2002). Writing. In J. C. Richards & W. A. Renandya(Eds.), Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice (pp. 315-320). Cambridge University Press. This chapter provides an overview of the process approach and its implementation in EFL writing classrooms. It discusses how engaging students in pre-writing activities, multiple drafts, and peer feedback can lead to improved writing quality.

Utebaev T., Sarsenbaeva Z. Linguoculturological analysis of proverbs //Berlin Studies Transnational Journal of Science and Humanities. – 2021. – Т. 1. – №. 1.5 Pedagogical sciences.

Zhang, S. (2015). Exploring the impacts of process approach on EFL college students' writing performance: A case study in China. English Language Teaching, 8(1), 144-156. This study examines the effects of incorporating the process approach in EFL writing classes in a Chinese university. The research demonstrates that students who engaged in the process approach showed significant improvement in writing skills and a more positive attitude towards writing.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-03

Issue

Section

THEORETICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS OF THE FORMATION OF FOREIGN LANGUAGE COMMUNICATIVE COMPETENCE

How to Cite

ENHANCING WRITING COMPETENCE IN TEACHING ENGLISH AS A FOREIGN LANGUAGE VIA PROCESS APPROACH. (2024). Konferensiyalar | Conferences, 1(13), 523-532. https://uzresearchers.com/index.php/Conferences/article/view/3588