ENHANCING BUSINESS ENGLISH TEACHING AND LEARNING THROUGH SMART TECHNOLOGIES: AN IMRAD-STRUCTURED REVIEW

Authors

  • Rushana Inoyatova Rustam qizi Independent researcher, Namangan State Institute of Foreign Languages G-mail:rushana98inoyatova@gmail.com

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66345/stj.6549

Keywords:

English for Specific Purposes (ESP), Business English, Mobile-Assisted Language Learning (MALL), smart classrooms, Artificial Intelligence, Web 2.0, professional communication, workplace language skills, digital technologies.

Abstract

This paper investigates the application of smart and mobile technologies to English for Specific Purposes (ESP), with particular emphasis on Business English instruction. Drawing on an integrative review of empirical and theoretical literature, the study identifies four principal challenges confronting Business English learners—occupational vocabulary acquisition, motivational decline, professional communication competence, and learner autonomy—and examines how Mobile-Assisted Language Learning (MALL), artificial intelligence (AI), Web 2.0 applications, and social networking tools may address these challenges. The paper reviews smart education strategies in high-performing economies (the Netherlands, Australia, South Korea) and evaluates the instructional affordances of six technology categories: wiki-based platforms, adaptive language applications, electronic dictionaries, social media channels, business-oriented video content, and slide presentation frameworks. Findings indicate that technology-enhanced ESP instruction, when anchored in authentic occupational contexts, substantially improves learner motivation, professional vocabulary range, written business communication, and presentation competence. The paper concludes with practical pedagogical recommendations and a call for context-specific empirical research with Uzbek Business English learners.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Basturkmen, H. (2010). Developing Courses in English for Specific Purposes. Palgrave Macmillan.

2. Coxhead, A. (2000). A new Academic Word List. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 213–238.

3. Csizér, K., & Lukács, G. (2010). The comparative analysis of motivation, attitudes and selves: The case of English and German in Hungary. System, 38(1), 1–13.

4. Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2011). Teaching and Researching Motivation (2nd ed.). Pearson Longman.

5. Dudley-Evans, T., & St John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for Specific Purposes: A Multi-Disciplinary Approach. Cambridge University Press.

6. Ellis, R. (2003). Task-Based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford University Press.

7. Fedyunina, E. V., & Rassada, S. A. (2020). Slide presentations as means of foreign language speaking. Modern Technologies in Foreign Language Teaching, 157–162.

8. Godwin-Jones, R. (2003). Blogs and wikis: Environments for on-line collaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 12–16.

9. Godwin-Jones, R. (2017). Smartphones and language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 21(2), 3–17.

10. Gonulal, T. (2019). The use of Instagram as a mobile-assisted language learning tool. Contemporary Educational Technology, 10(3), 309–323. https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.590108

11. Harding, K. (2007). English for Specific Purposes. Oxford University Press.

12. Hwang, G.-J. (2014). Definition, framework and research issues of smart learning environments. Smart Learning Environments, 1(1), 1–14.

13. Islomova, M. (2023). Sunʼiy intellektning chet tilini oʼrganishdagi afzalliklari. Pedagogs International Research Journal, 37(1), 27–29.

14. Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Shield, L. (2008). An overview of mobile assisted language learning: From content delivery to supported collaboration and interaction. ReCALL, 20(3), 271–289.

15. Louhiala-Salminen, L. (2002). The fly’s perspective: Discourse in the daily routine of a business manager. English for Specific Purposes, 21(3), 211–231.

16. Maksimkulova, S. (2023). Til taʼlimida raqamli texnologiyalar va sunʼiy intellekt vositalaridan foydalanish. Innovations in Technology and Science Education, 2(8), 1331–1342.

17. Mitchell, K. (2013). A social tool: Why and how ESOL students use Facebook. CALICO Journal, 29(3), 471–493. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.29.3.471-493

18. Nelson, M. (2000). A Corpus-Based Study of Business English and Business English Teaching Materials. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Manchester.

19. Nickerson, C. (2005). English as a lingua franca in international business contexts. English for Specific Purposes, 24(4), 367–380.

20. Stockwell, G. (2012). Mobile-assisted language learning. In M. Thomas, H. Reinders & M. Warschauer (Eds.), Contemporary Computer-Assisted Language Learning (pp. 201–216). Bloomsbury.

21. Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2012). Academic Writing for Graduate Students (3rd ed.). University of Michigan Press.

22. Tomlinson, B. (Ed.). (2011). Materials Development in Language Teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

23. Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356–367.

24. Vesselinov, R., & Grego, J. (2012). Duolingo Effectiveness Study. City University of New York.

25. Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546–553.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-28

How to Cite

ENHANCING BUSINESS ENGLISH TEACHING AND LEARNING THROUGH SMART TECHNOLOGIES: AN IMRAD-STRUCTURED REVIEW. (2026). SCIENCE TIME JOURNAL, 4(5/1), 913-923. https://doi.org/10.66345/stj.6549
Indexed & Abstracted In

Our articles are indexed and discoverable across leading academic databases worldwide