“BURNOUT” AND “HAVOTIR” AS DISCURSIVE CONCEPTS: A THEORETICAL DISCUSSION OF PRAGMATIC ORIENTATIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66345/stj.v4i5/1.6313Keywords:
burnout, havotir, pragmatic orientation, mental-state discourse, speech acts, comparative pragmaticsAbstract
This article offers a theoretical discussion of how the concept burnout in English and havotir in Uzbek are constructed in contemporary motivational discourse. Drawing on pragmatic theory and lexical typology, the article identifies the distinct pragmatic orientations of the two concepts. English burnout is constructed through operational-tactical discourse oriented toward scheduling, reframing,
and identity-renarration. Uzbek havotir is constructed through contemplative-restorative discourse oriented toward recognition, reflection, and restorative pause. The article discusses theoretical and translation-theoretic implications of these pragmatic divergences and contributes to the comparative pragmatics of contemporary mental-state discourse.
Downloads
References
1. Mahmudov, N. (2011). Tilning mukammal tadqiqi yo'llarini izlab… O'zbekiston.
2. Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse markers. Cambridge University Press.
3. Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.
4. Wierzbicka, A. (1999). Emotions across languages and cultures: Diversity and universals. Cambridge University Press.
5. Xudoyberganova, D. (2013). Matnning antroposentrik tadqiqi. Fan.
6. Safarov, Sh. S. (2008). Pragmalingvistika. O'zbekiston Milliy Entsiklopediyasi.
